{"id":1158,"date":"2019-02-24T18:01:04","date_gmt":"2019-02-24T18:01:04","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/tradeven.cluster015.ovh.net\/wordpress\/?p=1158"},"modified":"2019-02-24T18:01:05","modified_gmt":"2019-02-24T18:01:05","slug":"eu-case-law-reports","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/tradevenvironment.eu\/index.php\/2019\/02\/24\/eu-case-law-reports\/","title":{"rendered":"EU CASE LAW REPORTS"},"content":{"rendered":"\n

Achmea<\/h2>\n\n\n\n
Download<\/a><\/div>\n\n\n\n

\u2018The End of the Game. The Autonomy of the EU Legal Order Opposes Arbitral tribunals under Bilateral Investment Treaties Concluded between two Member States\u20192018(1)\u00a0E.J.R.R.<\/em>\u00a0355-370.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Ecotaxes on Beverage Packaging<\/h2>\n\n\n\n
Download<\/a><\/div>\n\n\n\n

Case note on Case C-198\/14 (Valev Visnapuu), 25 (2) 2016\u00a0\u00a0RECIEL<\/em>\u00a0261-267. \u2013 Excise Duty on Certain Beverage Packaging:<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Case C-534\/13 Fipa<\/h2>\n\n\n\n
Download<\/a><\/div>\n\n\n\n

\u2018\u2018Case note. Preliminary Reference on Environmental Liability and the Polluter Pays Principle\u2019\u00a0RECIEL<\/em>\u00a024(2) 2015 233-37.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Protection juridictionnelle-EIE<\/h2>\n\n\n\n
Download<\/a><\/div>\n\n\n\n

CJUE, 15 octobre 2015,\u00a0Commission \/ Allemagne<\/em>, aff. C-137\/14,\u00a0R.A.E-L.A.E<\/em>., 2016\/1, p. 739-748.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Droits d’accises sur les emballages<\/h2>\n\n\n\n
Download<\/a><\/div>\n\n\n\n

CJUE, 12 novembre 2015, aff. C-198\/14,\u00a0Valev Visnapuu<\/em>,\u00a0Energie – Environnement – Infrastructures<\/em>\u00a0– juillet 2016, p. 45 \u00e0 47.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Bases juridiques Euratom-TFUE<\/h2>\n\n\n\n
Download<\/a><\/div>\n\n\n\n

CJUE, 12 f\u00e9vrier 2015,\u00a0Parlement europ\u00e9en c. Conseil<\/em>, aff. C-48\/14 (Choix de la base juridique d\u2019une directive fixant les normes de qualit\u00e9 pour les substances radioactives dans les eaux destin\u00e9es \u00e0 la consommation humaine)<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Principe de pr\u00e9caution<\/h2>\n\n\n\n
Download<\/a><\/div>\n\n\n\n

Tribunal de l\u2019Union europ\u00e9enne, 21 mai 2015,\u00a0Rubinum s.a. c. Commissioneurop\u00e9enne,<\/em>\u00a0T-201\/13<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Cour constitutionnelle : arr\u00eats 144 et 145\/2013 – Het grond en pandendecreet<\/h2>\n\n\n\n
Download<\/a><\/div>\n\n\n\n

N. de Sadeleer, “Annulation partielle du\u00a0Wooncode<\/em>\u00a0par la Cour constitutionelle”,\u00a0Le Vif-l’Express<\/em>, 23 novembre 2013<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Epuration des eaux: arr\u00eat Commission c. Belgique, aff. C-533\/11<\/h2>\n\n\n\n
Download<\/a><\/div>\n\n\n\n

N. de Sadeleer, “Qui va payer l’amende dans le dossier des eaux us\u00e9es?”, L’Echo, 12 novembre 2013, p. 15.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Eaux urbaines r\u00e9siduaires : mmission c. Belgique, aff. C-533\/11<\/h2>\n\n\n\n
Download<\/a><\/div>\n\n\n\n

“Eaux urbaines r\u00e9siduaires: qui va payer la facture?”, Le Soir, 24 octobre 2013, p. 24-25.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Wooncode : Arr\u00eat Eric Libert, aff. jtes. C-197\/11 et C-203\/11<\/h2>\n\n\n\n
Download<\/a><\/div>\n\n\n\n

N. de Sadeleer, ” Le Wooncode au diapason des libert\u00e9s \u00e9conomiques fondamentales”, Le Vif-L’Express, 8 juin 2013<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Ordre public linguistique: arr\u00eat Anton Las<\/h2>\n\n\n\n
Download<\/a><\/div>\n\n\n\n

N. de Sadeleer, “Les travailleurs engag\u00e9s en Flandre resteront soumis \u00e0l’exigence d’exclusivit\u00e9 linguistique”, Le Vif-l’Express, 19 mai 2013<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Chronique de jurisprudence – Environnement<\/h2>\n\n\n\n
Download<\/a><\/div>\n\n\n\n

N. de Sadeleer et C. Poncelet, “Chronique de jurisprudence- droit de l’environnement- 2009-2012”,\u00a0Cahiers de droit europ\u00e9en,<\/em>\u00a02012, n\u00b04, pp. 452-588.\u00a0<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Achmea \u2018The End of the Game. The Autonomy of the EU Legal Order Opposes Arbitral tribunals under Bilateral Investment Treaties Concluded between two Member States\u20192018(1)\u00a0E.J.R.R.\u00a0355-370. Ecotaxes on Beverage Packaging Case note on Case C-198\/14 (Valev Visnapuu), 25 (2) 2016\u00a0\u00a0RECIEL\u00a0261-267. \u2013 Excise Duty on Certain Beverage Packaging: Case C-534\/13 Fipa \u2018\u2018Case […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_themeisle_gutenberg_block_has_review":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[54],"tags":[49,48],"class_list":["post-1158","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-papers-articles","tag-english","tag-francais"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/tradevenvironment.eu\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1158","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/tradevenvironment.eu\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/tradevenvironment.eu\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/tradevenvironment.eu\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/tradevenvironment.eu\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1158"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/tradevenvironment.eu\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1158\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1159,"href":"https:\/\/tradevenvironment.eu\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1158\/revisions\/1159"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/tradevenvironment.eu\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1158"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/tradevenvironment.eu\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1158"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/tradevenvironment.eu\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1158"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}