Domestic environmental standards are likely to hinder within the internal market the free movement of goods and services. The articles below review the justification and the proportionality of a swathe of public environmental measures.
« Consistency between the granting of State aid and the polluter-pays principle : Aids aimed at mitigating climate change », 1 (2020) Climate Law 28-49.
‘The End of the Game. The Autonomy of the EU Legal Order Opposes Arbitral tribunals under Bilateral Investment Treaties Concluded between two Member States’ E.J.R.R., 2018(1) 355-370.
I. Damjanovic and N. de Sadeleer ‘I Would Rather Be a Respondent State Before a Domestic Court in the EU than Before an International Investment Tribunal’, European Papers, 2019
‘Les tribunaux d’investissement mis sur la sellette au nom de l’autonomie du droit de l ‘UE’, R.A.E-L.A.E., 2018/1, p. 117-127.
N. de Sadeleer, ‘Preliminary ruling on the compatibility of taxation of superstores with the right to freedom of establishment and State aid law: Case C-233/16, ANGED’ RECIEL 2018(1)-(7) 341-347.
Trade v Environment « Trade v Environment in EU Law», US-China Law Rev. 13: 5 (2016) 365-381. Earthen Pot ‘Trade v. Environmental Law – The Fable of the Earthen Pot and the Iron Pot’, Environmental Policy and Law 45: 1 (2015) 23-27. Trade in Wildlife ‘Trading in wildlife under the Habitats and Birds Directives. Restricted movement Read more…