Domestic environmental standards are likely to hinder within the internal market the free movement of goods and services. The articles below review the justification and the proportionality of a swathe of public environmental measures.
L’interdiction de l’usage du glyphosate à Bruxelles: l’arroseur arrosé? , Le Soir, 14 novembre 2018
‘Les tribunaux d’investissement mis sur la sellette au nom de l’autonomie du droit de l ‘UE’, R.A.E-L.A.E., 2018/1, p. 117-127.
N. de Sadeleer, ‘Preliminary ruling on the compatibility of taxation of superstores with the right to freedom of establishment and State aid law: Case C-233/16, ANGED’ RECIEL 2018(1)-(7) 341-347.
Trade v Environment « Trade v Environment in EU Law», US-China Law Rev. 13: 5 (2016) 365-381. Earthen Pot ‘Trade v. Environmental Law – The Fable of the Earthen Pot and the Iron Pot’, Environmental Policy and Law 45: 1 (2015) 23-27. Trade in Wildlife ‘Trading in wildlife under the Habitats and Birds Directives. Restricted movement Read more…
State aids “State Aids and Environmental Protection: Time for Promoting the Polluter-Pays Principle”, Nordisk miljörättslig tidskrift/Nordic Environmental Law Journal, 2012:1, pp. 3-30. Français Aides d’Etat – notion d’entreprise Trib. UE, 12 septembre 2013, aff. T 347/09, Allemagne c/Commission, in Agt.-Envt., 2014/2, p. 32-33. Finnish Ey: n kilpailusääntöjen vaikutus viranomaisten ja yritysten menettelyyn ympärisön Read more…