Internal Market & Competition law
Trade v Environment in the EU
“Trade v Environment in the EU”, US-China Law Rev. 13:5 (2016) 365-381.
Domestic environmental standards are likely to hinder within the internal market the free movement of goods and services. The articles below review the justification and the proportionality of a swathe of public environmental measures.
“Trade v Environment in the EU”, US-China Law Rev. 13:5 (2016) 365-381.
I Damjanovic and N de Sadeleer, ‘Labour Standards in International Trade Agreements: A Rule of Law Perspective’Labour Standards in International Trade Agreements: A Rule of Law Perspective, European Journal of Risk Regulation (2024), 15, 551–571
« Consistency between the granting of State aid and the polluter-pays principle : Aids aimed at mitigating climate change », 1 (2020) Climate Law 28-49.
‘The End of the Game. The Autonomy of the EU Legal Order Opposes Arbitral tribunals under Bilateral Investment Treaties Concluded between two Member States’ E.J.R.R., 2018(1) 355-370.
I. Damjanovic and N. de Sadeleer ‘I Would Rather Be a Respondent State Before a Domestic Court in the EU than Before an International Investment Tribunal’, European Papers, 2019